Political Yard
  • Homepage
  • Political Forums News Articles News User Blogs Links RSS
    Home Latest News War News World News Headlines Community Opinion Articles Blogs RSS Feed
    My Yard
    Username
    Password
    Register
    Bottom Menu
    spacer
    Latest Posts
    - Forum Upgrade
    - Political Yard - v2.0
    Launched!

    - Re: Is It Just Me?
    - Re: Republican Front
    runner

    - Re: Hillary: Obama
    strongest, but will
    diminish

    Bottom Menu
    spacer
    spacer
    Forums
    Will the Bailout plan work?

    Absolutely, I have confidence in Paulson
    Pfff, who cares?
    Not sure
    No way, but I sure wish it would
    Results


    Affiliates:
    Realm of Gaming
    Political Bill
    XBOX 360 News
    Gaming Evolution
    The Daily Internet
    Hilarious Videos
    Free Myspace Stuff
    Classic Sega
    Video Game Cheats
    Election Projection

    [ Apply for Affiliation ]

    Go to electionprojection.com

    Your Ad Here


    Links Page

    Top Political Sites

    Top Politics blogs
    Pakistan is an ally? Article - Political Yard
    Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Furl Post to Netscape Post to Newsvine Post to Reddit Post to Simpy Post to Spurl Post to StumbleUpon
    Pakistan is an ally?

    Posted Jun 11, 2008 - 12:34 pm by charliepage 167 views

    I know to say that Pakistan has been big friends with the US would be overstated, but we are "allies". Unfortunately our "ally" has been unable to even control a decent chunk of it's country (Waziristan), allowing Taliban to flow right into Afghanistan. On February 27, 2007 the top US intelligence official even said officially, that Bin Laden was in Pakistan.

     

    If all that wasn't bad enough, not one but TWO stories have come out today that are quite startling. The first story is about an attack on US forces in Pakistan commited by the Taliban. When the story first came out, it was said 10-13 Pakistani soldiers were killed by US-Afghan forces, but in the recent several hours we found out a key piece of the puzzle missing. Here's a few quotes from a Washington Post article:

    "Taliban militants apparently opened fire and were then joined by Pakistani military forces, setting off an hours-long battle. It is unclear what prompted the exchange of fire."

    "We have inflicted heavy damages," Omar said. The Taliban spokesman said Islamist insurgents fought "side by side" with Pakistani soldiers against the Afghan forces during the operation."

    The reason Pakistani soldiers and Taliban were killed in the border clash was because the Pakistani soldiers were fighting with the Taliban. Okay, so isolated incident, right? Wrong.

    "Pakistani intelligence agents and paramilitary forces have helped train Taliban insurgents and have given them information about American troop movements in Afghanistan, said a report published Monday by a U.S. think tank."

    It said NATO officials have uncovered several instances of Pakistani intelligence agents providing information to Taliban fighters, even "tipping off Taliban forces about the location and movement of Afghan and coalition forces, which undermined several U.S. and NATO anti-Taliban military operations." The report said Pakistan's intelligence service and other government agencies provided Taliban and other insurgents with training at camps in Pakistan, as well as intelligence, financial assistance and help crossing the border."

    These startling accusations were not from WorldNetDaily or some cookey website, but from the very reputable RAND - Source. Good ally, right?


    • Vote: 0
    Comments





    Post a Comment

     email

     website





        join staff  |  bookmark us  |  privacy policy  |  about us  |  contact us  |  advertise  -  Copyright © 2006-2008 Political Yard
    Powered by AdaptCMS Pro
    Myspace Images | Credit Cards | Symbian Cell Phone Software | Credit Monitoring | Car Finance