The mainstream media hasn't even mentioned that the Jersey girls, the 4 9/11 widows who brought about the 9/11 Commission, have released a statement questioning "the veracity of the entire 9/11 Commission Report."http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Group_of_widows_claim_911_Independent_0804.html One problem with Popular Mechanics and government reports like FEMA and NIST is they fail to mention the 47 thick, steel core columns that lined the inside of WTC1&2.http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/core.html The Twin Towers were not hollow like a pop can (we get this baseless arguement a lot.)Be skeptical over 9/11 conspiracies, but the bottom line is that jet fuel CAN'T melt steel, yet pools of molten steel were found in the basements of WTC 1, 2, and Building 7. http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/moltensteel.htmlAll buildings imploded (not collapsed) into their own foundation in 10 seconds or less (faster than free fall speeding meaning the 80+ stories below posed no resistanced and had to of been thrown out to make way for the other floors).http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/deceptions/collapses.html All steel high rise buildings and skyscrapers (or any structure that's going to support a very heavy load) is overbuilt to withstand heavy loads of force than they will ever experience in their lives. All the designers of the Twin Towers were amazed when the buildings collapsed because of this. Many even admit that they planned for jet liner impacts, and believe that many could of crashed into the Twin Towers without them ever collapsing.Most steel high rise buildings and skyscrapers experience a large fire that burns for longer, hotter, and across far more floors than the Twin Towers experienced on 9/11.http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/fires.htmlOutside of 9/11, in the entire history of skyscrapers or steel high frame buildings have only collapsed due to earthquakes or C4.http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/collapses.html The North tower of the WTC even had a large fire in 1975, that burned way hotter and for far longer than it burned on 9/11. In spite of this, it did not collapse.http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/history/fire.html Once again, the buildings collapsed at free fall speeds, into gigantic clouds of dust.Since when does steel magically collapse to dust, vaporizing everything inside of the towers (which would of required extrodinary heat), including over 1,000 victims?Only on 9/11, where Jihadists were able to bend the laws of physics for their own gains.Loose Change are fringe conspiracists.The 9/11 Truth Movement bases it's findings from experts in the field who know what they're talking about, government reports, mainstream media accounts, eyewitness accounts, and the laws of physics. Here are some good videos.David Ray Griffin going over the facts behind 9/11http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6837001821567284154&q=david+ray+griffinImprobable Collapse and 9/11 Mysteries, both of which explain why the collapse of the Twin Towers defy the laws of physics.9/11 Mysteries:http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=9%2F11+mysteriesImprobable Collapse:http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4026073566596731782&q=improbable+collapse9/11 Truth Movement Links:911truth.org911research.comwtc7.netSupport the family members of the 9/11 victims by supporting a call for a new investigation!They have been fighting for this for over 5 years, and it's still not over!
The mainstream media hasn't even mentioned that the Jersey girls, the 4 9/11 widows who brought about the 9/11 Commission, have released a statement questioning "the veracity of the entire 9/11 Commission Report."http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Group_of_widows_claim_911_Independent_0804.html
One problem with Popular Mechanics and government reports like FEMA and NIST is they fail to mention the 47 thick, steel core columns that lined the inside of WTC1&2.http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/core.html
The Twin Towers were not hollow like a pop can (we get this baseless arguement a lot.)
Be skeptical over 9/11 conspiracies, but the bottom line is that jet fuel CAN'T melt steel, yet pools of molten steel were found in the basements of WTC 1, 2, and Building 7. http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/moltensteel.html
All buildings imploded (not collapsed) into their own foundation in 10 seconds or less (faster than free fall speeding meaning the 80+ stories below posed no resistanced and had to of been thrown out to make way for the other floors).http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/deceptions/collapses.html
All steel high rise buildings and skyscrapers (or any structure that's going to support a very heavy load) is overbuilt to withstand heavy loads of force than they will ever experience in their lives. All the designers of the Twin Towers were amazed when the buildings collapsed because of this. Many even admit that they planned for jet liner impacts, and believe that many could of crashed into the Twin Towers without them ever collapsing.
Most steel high rise buildings and skyscrapers experience a large fire that burns for longer, hotter, and across far more floors than the Twin Towers experienced on 9/11.http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/fires.html
Outside of 9/11, in the entire history of skyscrapers or steel high frame buildings have only collapsed due to earthquakes or C4.http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/collapses.html
The North tower of the WTC even had a large fire in 1975, that burned way hotter and for far longer than it burned on 9/11. In spite of this, it did not collapse.http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/history/fire.html
Once again, the buildings collapsed at free fall speeds, into gigantic clouds of dust.
Since when does steel magically collapse to dust, vaporizing everything inside of the towers (which would of required extrodinary heat), including over 1,000 victims?
Only on 9/11, where Jihadists were able to bend the laws of physics for their own gains.
Loose Change are fringe conspiracists.The 9/11 Truth Movement bases it's findings from experts in the field who know what they're talking about, government reports, mainstream media accounts, eyewitness accounts, and the laws of physics.
Here are some good videos.
David Ray Griffin going over the facts behind 9/11http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6837001821567284154&q=david+ray+griffinImprobable Collapse and 9/11 Mysteries, both of which explain why the collapse of the Twin Towers defy the laws of physics.9/11 Mysteries:http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=9%2F11+mysteriesImprobable Collapse:http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4026073566596731782&q=improbable+collapse
9/11 Truth Movement Links:911truth.org911research.comwtc7.net
Support the family members of the 9/11 victims by supporting a call for a new investigation!They have been fighting for this for over 5 years, and it's still not over!
I'm glad that you at least don't believe Loose Change but I will try to respond to links you posted though I won't be able to respond to them all right now. (assuming you stayed more than to just post this)http://www.911myths.com/html/collapse_time.htmlThat is regarding collapse time and fireproofing.http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc_707_impact.htmlRegarding impact of an airliner, although there are some good articles on the site you listed for it to say that in history no high-rise building has been brought down anything but C4 or earthquakes, how many airplanes screaming in at full speed have hit high-rise buildings? Seems to be a bad point compared to the rest IMO.For the imploding parts you reference read here:http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc__demolition_.htmlHope that helps.
I'm glad that you at least don't believe Loose Change but I will try to respond to links you posted though I won't be able to respond to them all right now. (assuming you stayed more than to just post this)
http://www.911myths.com/html/collapse_time.html
That is regarding collapse time and fireproofing.
http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc_707_impact.html
Regarding impact of an airliner, although there are some good articles on the site you listed for it to say that in history no high-rise building has been brought down anything but C4 or earthquakes, how many airplanes screaming in at full speed have hit high-rise buildings? Seems to be a bad point compared to the rest IMO.
For the imploding parts you reference read here:
http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc__demolition_.html
Hope that helps.
I know around 30 people that were directly affected on WTC, and they all say that they have been shown proof from the government that it was clearly not planned.
Your statement is just as valid as someone telling you that I showed them proof that pizza is the anti-christ.
Quote:Your statement is just as valid as someone telling you that I showed them proof that pizza is the anti-christ.
Which is true.
Quote:Quote:Your statement is just as valid as someone telling you that I showed them proof that pizza is the anti-christ. Which is true.
Well, not just any pizza. It's Dominoe's new Brooklyn-style pizza that's the anti-christ.
Quote:I know around 30 people that were directly affected on WTC, and they all say that they have been shown proof from the government that it was clearly not planned.
Prove it sir.